Email this article 
Fostering Students' Attitudes Towards STEM Using STEM Project-Based Learning in Learning Optical Instruments
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) National Taiwan Normal University
(4) Universitas Negri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Education is a key driver in cultivating a skilled generation, providing innovative STEM learning to enhance future prospects. This research analysed the effect of STEM project-based Learning in optical instrument topics on students' attitudes and perception towards STEM. Conducted through a quasi-experimental method, the research drew its sample from 8th-grade students in a junior high school in Bandung, Indonesia, evenly split between control (n=30) and experimental (n=30) classes. The control class is taught by project-based learning, while STEM PJBL taught to the experimental class. The result of this study was an N-Gain of students' attitudes towards STEM in experimental class showed a 0.11, which is still categorized as low enhancement. The T-test result (asymp. sig. (2-tailed) = 0.54) also shows no significant difference between the control and experimental classes. Furthermore, engineering and technology are favored STEM subscale, seen as fostering creativity subscale, followed by science, which students' enjoy most of science with no counting lesson, However, most students hold a negative view of mathematics subscale due to the complexity of formulas provided in the lesson. Based on this research, STEM-PJBL should be applied in creative, innovative, and consistent ways within the science class to get a higher shift in students' attitudes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school’s students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261-267.
Anigbo, L. C., & Idigo, E. (2015). FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS INTEREST IN MATHEMATICS IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ENUGU STATE. Journal of Science & Computer Education, 3(3).
Aripin, W. A., Sahidu, H., & Makhrus, M. (2021). Efektivitas perangkat pembelajaran fisika berbasis model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia, 3(1).
Azhar, A. (2013). Pendidikan fisika dan keterkaitannya dengan laboratorium. Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 7-12.
Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2019). The impact of an out-of-school STEM education program on students’ attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics, 119, 223–235.
Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The influence of project-based STEM (PjbL-STEM) applications on the development of 21st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 798-815.b
Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3-23.
Bingolbali, E., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (2007). Engineering students’ conceptions of the derivative and some implications for their mathematical education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(6), 763–777.
Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interest in science. Science education, 100(2), 364-391.
Bulu, V. R., & Tanggur, F. (2021). The effectiveness of STEM-based PjBL on student’s critical thinking skills and collaborative attitude. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 219-228.
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science Technology Engineering Mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Çevik, M., & Özgünay, E. (2018). STEM Education through the Perspectives of Secondary Schools Teachers and School Administrators in Turkey. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 91-101.
Ching, Y. H., Yang, D., Wang, S., Baek, Y., Swanson, S., & Chittoori, B. (2019). Elementary school student development of STEM attitudes and perceived learning in a STEM integrated robotics curriculum. TechTrends, 63, 590-601.
Cook, T. D. (2015). Quasi‐experimental design. Wiley encyclopedia of management, 1-2.
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. . SAGE publications.
Damar, A., Durmaz, C., & Önder, İ. (2017). Middle School Students’ Attitudes towards STEM Applications and Their Opinions about These Applications. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 1(1), 47-65.
Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26.
Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., & Avraamidou, L. (2021). Enhancing students’ interest in science and understandings of STEM careers: the role of career-based scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 717-736.
Escobar, M., & Qazi, M. (2020). Builders: A project-based learning experience to foster STEM interest in students from underserved high schools. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 21(3).
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
Gerald, B. (2018). A brief review of independent, dependent and one sample t-test. International journal of applied mathematics and theoretical physics, 4(2), 50-54.
Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: a systematic review. Studies in Science education, 52(2), 199-231.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A., & Tanner, H. (1995). Gender differences in pupil attitudes to the national curriculum foundation subjects of English, mathematics, science, and technology in key stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies, 21, 85–97.
Karaahmetoğlu, K., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The effect of project-based arduino educational robot applications on students' computational thinking skills and their perception of basic stem skill levels. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 1-14.
Kartal, B., & Taşdemir, A. (2021). Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards STEM: Differences based on multiple variables and the relationship with academic achievement.
Kurt, M., & Benzer, S. (2020). An Investigation on the Effect of STEM Practices on Sixth Grade Students' Academic Achievement, Problem Solving Skills, and Attitudes towards STEM. Journal of Science Learning, 3(2), 79-88.
Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 860-876.
Lin, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Hsiao, H. H., Kao, C. P., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Developing student imagination and career interest through a STEM project using 3D printing with repetitive modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15.
Ling, T. W. (2017). Fostering understanding and reducing misconceptions about image formation by a plane mirror using constructivist-based hands-on activities. Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science: Strategies and Perspectives from Malaysia, 203-222.
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387-2404.
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50– 60.
McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann‐Whitney U Test. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-1.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American journal of physics, 70(12), 1259-1268.
Munifah, M., Romadhona, A. N., Ridhona, I., Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., & Tortop, H. S. (2019). How to Manage Numerical Abilities in Algebra Material?. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 223-232.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Özcan, H. & Koca, E. (2019). The Impact of Teaching the Subject “Pressure” with STEM Approach on the Academic Achievements of the Secondary School 7th Grade Students and Their Attitudes Towards STEM. Education and Science, 44(198), 201-227.
Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., & Nugroho, O. F. (2021). STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7-16.
Raharjo, S. (2019). Cara Menghitung N-Gain Score Kelas Eksperimen dan Kontrol dengan SPSS. SPSS Indonesia. https://www.spssindonesia.com/2019/04/cara-menghitung-n-gain-score-spss.html
Raharjo, S. (2017). Contoh Kasus Uji Beda Mann Whitney Menggunakan SPSS. SPSS Indonesia. https://www.spssindonesia.com/2017/04/uji-mann-whitney-spss.html
Raharjo, S. (2015). Cara Uji Normalitas Shapiro-Wilk dengan SPSS Lengkap. SPSS Indonesia. https://www.spssindonesia.com/2015/05/cara-uji-normalitas-shapiro-wilk-dengan.html
Razali, N.M & Wah, Y.B. (2011).Power Comparisons Saphiro Wilk, Kolmogorov – Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson Darling Test. Jurnal of Statistical modeling and analytics Vol.2.No.1, 21-33, 2011
Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2020). The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 94-108.
Sari, U., Alıci, M., & Şen, Ö. F. (2018). The efect of STEM Instruction on attitude, career perception and career interest in a problem-based learning environment and student opinions. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 22, 1–21.
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Project-Based and STEM Teaching and Learning Module on Enhancing Scientific Creativity among Fifth Graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017-1033.
Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-stem project-based learning: Its impact to critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11-21.
Syahfira, R., Permana, N. D., Susilawati, S., & Azhar, A. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep IPA siswa pada materi cahaya dan optik. Indonesian journal of education and learning, 5(1), 16-23.
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students' interest in physics. Journal of science Education and Technology, 15, 47-58.
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 87-102.
Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622-639.
Ugras, M. (2018). The Effects of STEM Activities on STEM Attitudes, Scientific Creativity and Motivation Beliefs of the Students and Their Views on STEM Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5).
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 80– 83.
Winarni, E. W., Karpudewan, M., Karyadi, B., & Gumono, G. (2022). Integrated PjBL-STEM in Scientific Literacy and Environment Attitude for Elementary School. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 8(2), 43-50.
Yang, D., & Chittoori, B. (2022). Investigating Title I school student STEM attitudes and experience in an after-school problem-based bridge building project. Journal of STEM education, 23(1).
Zhou, S. N., Zeng, H., Xu, S. R., Chen, L. C., & Xiao, H. (2019). Exploring Changes in Primary Students' Attitudes towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) across Genders and Grade Levels. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 466-480
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 77 timesPDF - 12 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.12.1.2024.40-51
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY EDUCATION
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG UNIVERSITY
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Telp. (024)76740231, 76740231
email: jps@unimus.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Journal Pendidikan Saisn (JPS)
ISSN:2339-0786, e-ISSN:2502-1443
Published by: Chemistry Education, Muhammadiyah Semarang University