The Analysis Student Interest in Chemistry Subjects on the National Exam in MAN Sleman Yogyakarta

Indri Denispriyanti(1), Agus Kamaludin(2*)


(1) Pendidikan Kimia, UIN Sunan Kalijaga
(2) Pendidikan Kimia, UIN Sunan Kalijaga
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to identify the difficulties experienced by students in learning chemistry. Besides, this study also aims to identify the factors causing the low interest in the National Examination of chemistry and determine students' interest in chemistry in the National Examination. This research is a type of descriptive research with a survey method. The population in this study was MAN in Sleman Regency and 3 of them were selected as samples. Sampling is done by stratified random sampling based on the value and number of chemical enthusiasts into 3 subpopulations. Data collection techniques in this study were closed questionnaires, interviews, and documents. The research instruments used were questionnaire sheets, interview guidelines, and documents. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics using percentages. The validity of the data used is technical triangulation. The results showed students' interest in chemistry subjects in the National Examination was included in the low category with a percentage of 15.2%.

Keywords


Chemistry, MAN Sleman, National Examination Students’ Interest

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alawiyah, F. (2015). Perubahan kebijakan ujian nasional: Studi pelaksanaan ujian nasional 2015. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial, 6(2), 189-202. DOI: 10.46807/aspirasi.v6i2.513.

Baedowi, A. (2015). Potret pendidikan kita. Tangerang: Pustaka Alfavabet.

BSNP. (2019). Sosialisasi kebijakan ujian nasional tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Gunawan, I., &Palupi, A. R. (2012). Taksonomi bloom revisi ranah kognitif: kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan penilaian. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran 2(02), 98-117. DOI: 10.25273/pe.v2i02.50.

Hidayah, N. (2013). Ujian nasional dalam perspektif kebijakan publik. Jurnal Pencerahan, 7(1), 35-40. DOI: 10.13170/jp.7.1.2053.

Idrus, M. (2010). Ujian nasional dalam konsep evaluasi pendidikan. Millah: Jurnal Studi Agama, 10, 201-220. DOI: 10.20885/millah.ed.khus.art12.

Indahari, Y. (2016, Desember). Moratorium ujian nasional. Majalah Info Singkat Kesejahteraan Sosial, 8(23), 9-12. Retrieved from http://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-VIII-23-I-P3DI-Desember-2016-29.pdf

Ismail, H. (2015). Pro kontra ujian nasional. Al-Riwayah : Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(2), 301-324. Retrieved from https://e-jurnal.iainsorong.ac.id/index.php/Al-Riwayah/article/view/103.

Liyah. (2014). Potret kesiapan sekolah MAN 2 Yogyakarta, SMA Piri 1 Yogyakarta, SMAN 5 Yogyakarta, SMA N 7 Yogyakarta, dan SMAN 10 Yogyakarta dalam menghadapi ujian nasional kimia tahun 2014. Skripsi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Marsita, R. A., Priatmoko, S., & Kusuma, E. (2010). Analisis kesulitan belajar kimia siswa SMA dalam memahami materi larutan penyangga dengan menggunakan two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1), 512-520. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/1308

Mulyono.(2006). Membuat reagen kimia di laboratorium. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Pangesti, A. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi peserta didik pada penyelesaian soal HOT ujian nasional kimia tahun ajaran 2013/2014 rayon SMA. Skripsi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Ristiyani, E., & Bahriah, E. S. (2016). Analisis kesulitan belajar kimia siswa di SMAN X Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 18-29. DOI: 10.30870/jppi.v2i1.431.

Rochman, S., & Hartoyo, Z. (2018). Analisis High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) taksonomi menganalisis permasalahan fisika. SPEJ (Science and Physic Education Journal), 1(2), 78-88. DOI: 10.31539/spej.v1i2.268

Shidiq, A. S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. (2015, 19 November). Analisis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) menggunakan instrumen two-tier multiple choice pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan untuk siswa kelas XI SMA N 1 Surakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, Surakarta. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/7972/0.

Silverius, S. (2010). Kontroversi Ujian Nasional Sepanjang Masa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 16(2), 194-205. DOI: 10.24832/jpnk.v16i2.446.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda karya.

Suyanti, R.D. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Takrifin, A. (2009). Ujian nasional: Invalid, inreliabel, inkonstitusional, dan bertentangan dengan HAM. Forum Tarbiyah, 7(2), 209-227. Retrieved from http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/forumtarbiyah/article/view/263.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 355 times
PDF - 66 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.9.2.2021.146-151

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS (JPS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY EDUCATION
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG UNIVERSITY

Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
    Telp. (024)76740231, 76740231
    email: jps@unimus.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Journal Pendidikan Saisn (JPS)
ISSN:2339-0786, e-ISSN:2502-1443
Published by: Chemistry Education, Muhammadiyah Semarang University