Navigating the "Dependency Trap": A Systematic Literature Review on Generative AI in EFL Learning and Its Contextual Barriers

Ervinda Dwi Meidyana(1*)


(1) Universitas Airlangga
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is changing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education. Students often use GenAI as a backup resource or private tutor because of challenges such as large class sizes and delayed teacher feedback. However, this creates a major risk: the technology can easily shift from a helpful learning support into a tool that does the actual thinking and writing for the student. This systematic literature review synthesizes research from 2023 to 2026 to examine how classroom barriers and student habits combine to create a “dependency trap”. It is a self-reinforcing cycle where over-reliance on AI hinders independent language development. By following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across Scopus and Web of Science. The screening focused on peer-reviewed studies investigating the structural, cultural, and pedagogical challenges of using GenAI in global EFL contexts. The synthesis shows that a lack of clear university policies, unequal access to technology, and teacher stress all accelerate student dependency on AI. Students often trust fluent AI outputs blindly because the text sounds academic, even when they lack the skills to spot errors. This leads to two major risks: cognitive offloading, which creates fluency without comprehension, and a loss of unique student voice, where writing becomes repetitive and formulaic. The study concludes that simply allowing students to use AI without guidance is insufficient. Instead, educational institutions must establish clear usage policies and formal AI literacy training. This will help students critically evaluate AI tools and protect their own learning autonomy.


Keywords


generative AI, EFL learning, contextual barriers, dependency trap, systematic literature review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdelhalim, S. M., & Alsehibany, R. A. (2025). Integrating ChatGPT for vocabulary learning and retention: A classroom-based study of Saudi EFL. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73635

Abduh, A., Rosmaladewi, R., Arham, M., & Asnur, M. N. A. (2025). Empowering EFL Learners Through Generative AI: A Qualitative Exploration of Inclusive and Autonomous Learning in Multicultural Contexts. IJOLE (International Journal of Language Education), 9(1), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.74760

Aiman, N., Akber, A. G., Aslam, S., & Mazahir, I. (2025). AI Writing Tools and Media Literacy: Exploring ChatGPT as a Scaffold for ESL Learners’ Writing Skills in Higher Education. Media Education-Mediaobrazovanie, 21(4), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2025.4.490

Albadarneh, A. M., Daradkah, A. M., Telfah, E. A., Haggag, H. M., Ghawanmeh, F. F., Al-Shunnaq, Y. A., Tawalbeh, M. S., Mahmoud, A. M. A., Shahine, K., & Daradkah, H. S. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence-powered large language models in English as a foreign language EFL teacher education programs. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1), 3006–3015. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.00219

Albeihi, H. H. M., & Rice, M. F. (2025). Generative AI and Language Diversity: Implications for Teachers and Learners. Arab World English Journal, 16(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no1.3

Aldamen, H., Almashour, M., Al-Deaibes, M., & AlSharefeen, R. (2025). Testing Krashen’s input hypothesis with AI: a mixed-methods study on reading input and oral proficiency in EFL. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1614680

Ali, Y. A., Ali, M. M., Alharbi, W., Hamid, S., & Abbas, S. (2025). The influence of ChatGPT on English grammar among Saudi ESL learners. Arab World English Journal, 358–371. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI.21

Al-Kadi, A., & Ali, J. K. M. (2024). A holistic approach to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot in English learning and teaching. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.09

Al-Maawali, W. (2026). Exploring Omani EFL teachers’ perspectives on AI-Generated cultural content in ELT. Innovation In Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2026.2669321

Almusharraf, A., Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, T. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative AI in EFL writing: Strategies, self-efficacy, satisfaction and behavioural intention. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 41(5), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10045

Alzubi, A. A. F., Nazim, M., & Alyami, N. (2025). Do AI-generative tools kill or nurture creativity in EFL teaching and learning? Education and Information Technologies, 30(11), 15147–15184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8

Ansaree, F. N., & Uddin, M. M. (2026). University instructor agency in GenAI-supported ELT writing instruction: Practices and perceived challenges in under-resourced Asia-Pacific contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-026-00399-4

Arefian, M. H., Comoglu, I., & Dikilitas, K. (2026). Understanding EFL teachers’ experiences of ChatGPT-driven collaborative reflective practice through a community of practice lens. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 20(2), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2412769

Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0

Belda-Medina, J., & Kokosková, V. (2026). ChatGPT for language learning: assessing teacher candidates’ skills and perceptions using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 20(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2435900

Cao, L., & Abdullah, A. (2025). EBA (Engaged but Amotivated) in AI-enhanced EFL learning: a qualitative study from a Chinese higher vocational context. Frontiers iin Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1643653

Cen, X. Q., & Shakibaei, G. (2026). Enhancing creative writing through AI-powered co-creation with cognitive and emotional outcomes. Scientific Reports, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34416-2

Chen, A. X., Jia, J. Y., Li, Y. Z., & Fu, L. Y. (2025). Investigating the effect of role-play activity with GenAI agent on EFL students’ speaking performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241299058

Chen, Y., & Shim, J. (2026). Teacher support and L2 writing engagement in GenAI-integrated classrooms: a serial mediation model of growth mindset and needs satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1762106

Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013

Cong-Lem, N. (2025). “Is this really your work?”: A qualitative study of teacher-led interviews and student accountability in the age of generative AI. Journal of Academic Ethics, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09704-1

Cong-Lem, N., Tran, T. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of generative AI: Perceptions and responses of Vietnamese EFL teachers. Teaching English with Technology, 24(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.56297/FSYB3031/MXNB7567

Derakhshan, A. (2025). EFL students’ perceptions about the role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-mediated instruction in their emotional engagement and goal orientation: A motivational climate theory (MCT) perspective in focus. Learning and Motivation, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102114

Ding, J. Y., & Song, Y. J. (2026). Descriptive writing using generative AI as a cognitive scaffold in the metaverse environment: university students’ perceptions, learning engagement, and performance. Educational Psychology, 46(1), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2025.2568189

Dinh, C. T. (2025). EFL Students’ Perspectives on ChatGPT in Translation: Exploring AI Assistance, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 23(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.2.4006

Farangi, M. R., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2026). Emotional experiences of English language teachers in the age of generative AI. Teaching and teacher education, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105503

Firmstone, J. (2019). Editorial Journalism and Newspapers’ Editorial Opinions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.803

Hsu, H. P. (2025). An autoethnographic study of ESL academic writing with ChatGPT: from psychological insights to the SUPER framework. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2543113

Hsu, L. W. (2025). Entangled cognition in EFL education: The role of generative AI. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17621

Karu, E. K., & Hoque, M. A. (2024). User experience of ChatGPT: insights from undergraduate English language and literature students in Bangladesh. SiSal Journal, 15(3), 394–418. https://doi.org/10.37237/150305

Korucu-Kis, S., & Bakla, A. (2026). Exploring pre-service EFL teachers’ perceptions, use cases and questioning practices of ChatGPT during practicum: a critical digital pedagogy perspective. Instructional Science, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09783-6

Kurniati, E., Emaliana, I., & Sahar, R. (2025). Empathy and epistemic beliefs empower critical, culturally responsive ChatGPT integration in learning English academic writing. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2590919

Lee, Y. J., Davis, R. O., & Choi, J. I. (2025). Integrating generative AI into EFL writing: University students’ strategies and perceptions. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17545

Li, T. T., & Ding, Y. (2025). Exploring the GenAI literacy of Chinese university students in EFL learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.377175

Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. J. (2025). Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): a mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(7), 1632–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288

Nazim, M., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2025). Empowering EFL teachers’ perceptions of generative AI-mediated self-professionalism. Plos One, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326735

Neff, J., Arciaga, K., & Burri, M. (2024). EFL students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the ethical uses of artificial intelligence tools. Technology in Language Teaching and Learning, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1714

Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V, Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in academic writing in English as a foreign language. Education Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050611

Nguyen, T. H., Ta, N. Y. N., & Son, T. M. (2026). An exploratory study of Vietnamese EFL students’ engagement with AI tools: From acceptance to ethical use. Journal of Asia TEFL, 23(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2026.23.1.4.52

Shen, Y., & Guo, H. (2024). “I feel AI is neither too good nor too bad”: Unveiling Chinese EFL teachers’ perceived emotions in generative AI-Mediated L2 classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108429

Shen, Y. N., & Chen, L. (2025). “Critical chatting” or “casual cheating”: how graduate EFL students utilize ChatGPT for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2479141

Tekir, S. (2026). Generative AI use in EFL writing: associations with originality, critical reasoning, and metacognitive engagement in a Turkish higher education context. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2617399

Tsai, S. C. (2025). Online EFL business writing with GenAI-generated templates: Students’ performance and perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10743

Wang, L. Z., Zou, B., Wang, C. H., & Huang, F. (2025). Understanding learner motivation and intention to use ChatGPT for English language learning. Discover Computing, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09805-w

Wang, W. C., & Zou, M. M. (2026). Unveiling the role of l2 writing feedback engagement in Chatgpt-mediated language learning environment: Teacher support, L2 motivation, and emotions as predictors. European Journal of Education, 61(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70584

Wang, Y. D., & Fussell, S. R. (2026). “It’s safer to say I don’t use it”: Exploring ESL students’ self-perceptions as AI-assisted writers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3799448

Yang, W. L., & Lin, C. M. (2025). Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing: Students’ practices and perceptions. Journal Of Second Language Writing, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101181

Yang, Y. C., Qi, L., Wu, Z. Y., Shen, Y., Estigoy, E., Gray, S. Z., Sun, H., Zhang, B. H., & Jiang, G. Y. (2025). Self-determination, learning, and language technology engagement of Chinese international engineering college students: English as a foreign language. International Journal Of Computer-Assisted Language Learning And Teaching, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.379336


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: ellic@unimus.ac.id