What Do Our Future EFL Teachers Think about Using Mobile Devices in Class?
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
(2) The University of Arkansas, United States
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study is primarily aimed to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of Indonesian EFL pre-service teachers toward the use of mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets for learning and instructional practice in Indonesia. Furthermore, this phenomenological study attempted to reveal the factors affecting these two constructs from 20 Indonesian EFL pre-service teachers through semi-structured interviews. As teaching tools, the majority of the participants expressed their reluctance to use mobile devices as instructional tools in in-person classes. However, they acknowledged that this technology could facilitate online learning and agreed that this technology would become more popular in the future. Analysis of the data also revealed factors affecting beliefs and attitudes of pre-service teachers toward the use of mobile devices as instructional tools comprising perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness and other influencing elements of self-efficacy: enactive mastery and physiological arousal. Finally, this study presents implications and recommendations that can be a reference to optimize the integrated mobile technology for class instruction.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albadry, H. (2017). An investigation into the role of tablet devices in facilitating collaborative learning in EFL language course. iJET, 12(4), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6732
Alhinty, M. (2016). English-language learning at their fingertips: Educational and motivational affordances of tablet apps in children’s EFL learning [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield]. White Rose eTheses Online Repository. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/13686/
Alkhoudary, Y. A., & AlKhoudary, J. A. (2019). The effectiveness of flipping classroom model on EFL secondary school speaking skills. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v5i2.1811
Astuti, P., & Lammers, J. C. (2017). Individual accountability in cooperative learning: More opportunities to produce spoken English. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6878
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Blikstad-Balas, M. (2017). Key challenges of using video when investigating social practices in education: Contextualization, magnification, and representation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(5), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1181162
Burston, J. (2017). MALL: Global prospects and local implementation. CALL-EJ, 18(1), 1–8. from http://callej.org/journal/18-1/Burston2017.pdf
Chung, H. H., Chen, S. C., & Kuo, M. H. (2015). A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.479
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3): 319–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. &Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 928–1003. From http://eli.johogo.com/Class/p6.pdf
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2014). Research trends in mobile-assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000287
Flick, U., Von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Hlas, A. C., Conroy, K., & Hildebrandt, S. A. (2017). Student teachers and CALL: Personal and pedagogical uses and beliefs. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.26968
Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers and Education, 58(1), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008
Ibieta, A., Hinostroza, J. E., Labbé, C., & Claro, M. (2017). The role of the Internet in teachers’ professional practice: activities and factors associated with teacher use of ICT inside and outside the classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1296489
Imelda, Cahyono, B.Y., & Astuti, U. P. (2019). Effect of process writing approach combined with video-based mobile learning on Indonesian EFL learners’ writing skill across creativity levels. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12320a
Ishaq, K., Zin, N. A. M., Rosdi, F., Jehanghir, M., Ishaq, S., & Abid, A. (2021). Mobile-assisted and gamification-based language learning: A systematic literature review. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, 1–57. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.496
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of information technology, 21(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056
Khasbani, I. (2018). Revealing teachers’ motivational strategy in Indonesian EFL classrooms. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(4), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.1746
Kukulska–Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile-assisted language learning: from content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3). 249–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095834400800013X.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3701–3709). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768.pub2
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal language learning through mobile devices. In Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 281-294). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/1007/978-981-287-113-8
Menon, D., Chandrasekhar, M., Kosztin, D., & Steinhoff, D. C. (2020). Impact of mobile technology-based physics curriculum on preservice elementary teachers’ technology self-efficacy. Science Education, 104(2), 252–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21554
Milawati, M. (2019). Grammar Translation Method: Current Practice In EFL Context. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(1), 187-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.437
Moon, K., T. D. Brewer, S. R. Januchowski-Hartley, V. M. Adams, & D. A. Blackman. (2016). A guideline to improve qualitative social science publishing in ecology and conservation journals. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08663-210317
Moorhouse, B. L. & Beaumont, A. M. (2020). Utilizing video conferencing software to teach young language learners in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 class suspensions. TESOL Journal. 11(545). 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.545
Nariyati, N. P. L., Sudirman, S., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2020). EFL pre-service teachers’ perception toward the use of mobile-assisted language learning in teaching English. International Journal of Language Education, 4(2), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10052
Perry, B. (2015). Gamifying French Language Learning: A Case Study Examining a Quest-based, Augmented Reality Mobile Learning-tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2308–2315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.892
Reynolds, E. D., & Taylor, B. (2020). Kahoot!: EFL teachers’ implementation experiences and impacts on students’ vocabulary knowledge. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(2), 70-92. From http://callej.org/journal/21-2/Reynolds-Taylor2020.pdf
Şad, S. N., & Göktaş, Ö. (2014). Pre-service teachers' perceptions about using mobile phones and laptops in education as mobile learning tools. British journal of educational technology, 45(4), 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12064
Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning approaches of Indonesian EFL gen z students in a flipped learning context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v7i2.689
Sari F. M. & Putri, S. N. (2019). Academic WhatsApp group: Exploring students’ experiences in writing class. Teknosastik. 17(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v17i2.324
Schnackenberg, H. L., Vega, E. S., & Simard, D. A. (2014). Paradigm shift: introduction of a social media network and web 2.0 technology into a college classroom environment. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 2(16), 1-12. https://doi:10.4018/jcit.2014040101
Sibarani, C. (2019). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ use of Bahasa Indonesia in the English classroom. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(3), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i3.1315
Songbatumis, A. M. (2017). Challenges in teaching English faced by English teachers at MTsN Taliwang, Indonesia. Journal of foreign language teaching and learning, 2(2), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.2223
Staples, D. S., Hulland, J. S., & Higgins, C. A. (1999). A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 758-776. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.758
Statista Research Department (2020, July 29). Number of smartphone users in Indonesia from 2015 to 2025. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/266729/smartphone-users-in-indonesia/
Sulistiyo, U., Haryanto, E., Widodo, H. P., & Elyas, T. (2020). The portrait of primary school English in Indonesia: policy recommendations. Education 3-13, 48(8), 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1680721
Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 94, 252-275. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Terantino, J. (2016). Examining the effects of independent MALL on vocabulary recall and listening comprehension: An exploratory case study of preschool children. CALICO Journal, 33(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i2.26072
Thompson, D. S. (2019). Teaching students to critically read digital images: A visual literacy approach using the DIG method. Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(1-2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2018.1564604
Uluyol, C., & Agca, R. K. (2012). Integrating mobile multimedia into textbooks: 2D barcodes. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2012.05.018
Van Praag, B., & Sanchez, H. S. (2015). Mobile technology in second language classrooms: Insights into its uses, pedagogical implications, and teacher beliefs. ReCALL, 27(3), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000075
Wichadee, S. & Pattanapichet, F (2018). Enhancement of performance and motivation through application of digital games in an English language class. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1).77-92. From https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170635
Yau, J. Y. K., & Joy, M. (2011). A context-aware personalised m-learning application based on m-learning preferences. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(1), 1-14. From https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1504/IJMLO.2011.038688
Zain, D. S. M., & Bowles, F. A. (2021). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for higher education instructional practices in EFL/ESL contexts: A recent review of literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 282-307.
Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar?. Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17–36. From http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-01599aa2-be08-430c-b0cb-f57b6bdd4912
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 216 timesPDF - 54 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.