Learners’ Fillers in English

Abdul Rabbi Arrasul(1*), Yuliana Mangendre(2), Famelanisa Akbar T.A(3), Sitti Hardianti(4)


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk
(4) Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to find out the type of fillers and factor influenced fillers in English Education Study Program. This research is a qualitative research with in-depth interview design. This data collection involved 7 learners from the 4th semester and 6th semester of English Education Study Program at Muhammadiyah University of Luwuk. This research applied the theory from Rose (1998), Oomen and Postman (2021) in finding the data. The result of this research indicates the learners of English Education Study Program in 4th semester mostly use unlexicalized fillers and the 6th semester mostly use lexicalized fillers. There some factor influenced learners in using fillers are nervousness, divided Attention, infrequent. The dominant factor is nervousness. In this research, the input is suggested for learners, to the department of English Education Study Program and to further researchers to find out more about fillers and factor influenced fillers happened.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anna-Brita Stenstrom. (n.d.). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction.

Arrasul, A. R., & Pole, N. H. (2021). the Implementation of Clt (Communicative Language Teaching) To Improve Pupils’ Speaking Ability. BABASAL English Education Journal, 2(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.32529/beej.v2i2.1449

Castro, C., & M. (2009). The Use and Functions of Discourse Markers in EFL Classroom Interaction. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 1, 57–77.

Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition. 1, 73–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3

Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3

Fatimah, G. S. (2017). An Analysis of Fillers Used By Lecturer and Students in Efl Classroom Interaction. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 1(2).

García-López, L. J., Belén Díez-Bedmar, M., & Almansa-Moreno, J. M. (2013). De ser entrenado a ser entrenador: Cómo ayudar a otros iguales en la mejora de las competencias para hablar en público. Revista de Psicodidactica, 18(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.6419

Goldwater, S., Jurafsky, D., & Manning, C. D. (2010). Which words are hard to recognize? Prosodic, lexical, and disfluency factors that increase speech recognition error rates. Speech Communication, 52(3), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.10.001

I.R Gay, Millis E.G, A. W. . (2012). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications. In Pearson education Inc (10 edition). Pearson.

Indriyana, B. S., Sina, M. W., & Bram, B. (2021). Fillers and Their Functions in Emma Watson’s Speech. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 10(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v10i1.1350

Kharismawan, P. Y. (2017). the Types and the Functions of the Fillers Used in Barack Obama�S Speeches. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 1(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v1i1.680

M.Mukmin. (2021). Using Picture Strip Story in Teaching Speaking Skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 5(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v5i1.896

Navratilova, L. (2015). Fillers Used By Male And Female Students Of English Education Study Progrsm in Argumentative Talks. Linguistics and Languange Teaching, 10–17.

Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2021). Effects of Divided Attention on the Production of Filled Pauses and Repetitions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 5, 997–1004.

Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of Divided Attention on the Production of Filled Pauses and Repetitions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(5), 997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/078)

Patricia, L. (2017). Research Design Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.

ROSE, R. L. (1998). THE COMMUNICATIVE VALUE OF FILLED PAUSES IN SPONTANEOUS SPEECH. University of Birmingham.

Stenstrom, A. B. (1994). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. Third Impression. Pearson Education Limited.

W. L, N. (2007). Basic of Social research. Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. In J. Lasser (Ed.), Nucl. Phys. Person education. Inc.

Wu, J. (2001). A Quantitative Comparison of Disfluencies Types between Native and Non-native English Speakers in Spontaneous Speech.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 257 times
PDF - 119 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.