AN EVALUATION OF TEFL UNDERGRADUATE'S QUESTIONING CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES BASED ON BLOOM'S REVISED TAXONOMY

Dhestyn Ervina Sigit Cahyaningtyas(1*), Yudi Basuki(2), Joko Nurkamto(3), Ngadiso Ngadiso(4)


(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(4) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Lecturers’ talk during classes stimulates active students, as a means of a successful lecture. This study investigated the levels of questioning used by lecturers. The data, collected from the participants having more than ten year professional experience, were described qualitatively. Observation and interview were used to generate the data. The findings of this study indicated the questions level based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Mostly used was the low and middle order thinking, less encouraging students’ critical thinking. Noted 66 questions or about 73% of the total question belong to low order. 22 questions or 25% of all were included medium order. The rest of them, the least of all, 2 questions or equally to 2% were high order. Thus, students and lecturers could use the Bloom taxonomy to administer class activities with sufficient preparation, while further research might examine how to employ high order thinking skill in various areas. 


Keywords


undergraduate; questioning level; high order thinking; Bloom’s revised taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bojuwon, M., & Bojuwon, B. Y, “Measuring Lecturers Commitment Scales: A Second order confirmatory Factor Analysis,“ in The International Journal of Education and Research, 3(3),505-516, 2015.

Sadler, D. R, “Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education,“ Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 30(2), 175-194, 2005.

Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K, “Question asking during tutoring,“ in The American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137, 1994.

Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D, “Methods for teaching: Promoting student learning,“ Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill, 1999.

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A, “Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties,“ New York: Guilford Press, 2007.

Vandermeij, H., “Student questioning: A componential analysis. Learning and Individual Differences,“ 6(2), 137–161, 1994.

Shomoossi, N., “The effect of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFL classroom interaction: A classroom research study,“ The Reading Matrix, 4(2), 96–104, 2004.

Wilen, W. W, “Questioning skills, for teachers. What research says to the teacher?“ National Education Assocoation, 1991.

Ennis, R. H. A, “Taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities,“ In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 1-26). W. H. Freeman: New York, 1987.

Bloom, B. S, “Taxonomy of educational objectives - The classification of educational goals, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain,“ London: Longmans, 1956.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R, “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives (abridged ed.),“ New York: Longman, 2001.

Raphael, T. E, “Teaching question answer relationships, revisited,“ The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 516– 522, 1986.

Ashadi, Rido Imam & Lubis, Nazriani, “A survey on the levels of questioning of ELT: A case study in an Indonesian tertiary education,“ Advance in Language and Literary Studies: 8(3), 26-31, 2017.

Clandinin, D. J & Connelly, F. M, “Narrative inquiry experience and story in qualitative research,“ Jossey bass, 2000.

Cresswel, John W, “Qualitative inquiry and research design,“ Sage pub, 2007.

Tedam, Prospera, “When falling doesn’t matter: A narrative inquiry into the social practice learning experience of black African students in England, in The international journal of higher education, 3(1), 2014.

Lincoln, Y. S & Guba, E, G, “Naturalistic inquiry,“ Sage pub, 1985.

Soleimani, H., & Kheiri, S, “An Evaluation of TEFL Postgraduates' Testing Classroom Activities and Assignments Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy,“ Theory and Practice in


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 410 times
PDF - 55 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: ellic@unimus.ac.id