Evaluating Sign Language Interpreters’ Competence in Presidential Debates: A Case Study of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Debate

Valentina Widya Suryaningtyas(1*), Mangatur Rudolf Nababan(2), Riyadi Santosa(3)


(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The 2024 Indonesian Presidential Debate becomes a crucial means for Indonesian public to obtain political information. Therefore, this broadcast needs to be accessible to all citizens, including deaf audiences. However, presidential candidates often present ideas and arguments that contain technical terms and complex policy concepts. This can make it difficult for the general public to understand, especially deaf audiences, who often face challenges in accessing complex vocabulary compared to hearing audiences. In this context, sign language interpreters play a crucial role in bridging the communication between speakers and deaf audiences. Therefore, this study focuses on evaluating the competency of sign language interpreters involved in the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Debate broadcast to identify various competency aspects that support the implementation of interpreting tasks in the context of political debates. Therefore, this study used a qualitative approach to map the competency of sign language interpreters in the broadcast. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with interpreters, and the results were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify various competency aspects that play a role in the implementation of interpreting tasks in the context of political debates. The findings indicate that the interpreters have three competencies aspect such as linguistics, cultural and academics. Supported by appropriate psycho-physiological components, the sign language interpreters were able to adapt and simplify various terms and concepts used by the presidential candidates, making them more easily understood by deaf audiences.


Keywords


Deaf Audiences, Sign Language Interpreting, Translation Competence, Presidential Debate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alothman, A.A. (2021). Language and literacy of deaf children. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 799-819. http://psychologyandeducation.net/pae/index.php/pae/article/view/83

Antia, S. D., Lederberg, A. R., Easterbrooks, S., Schick, B., Branum-Martin, L., Connor, C. M., & Webb, M.-Y. (2020). Language and reading progress of young deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 25(3), 334–350. https://academic.oup.com/jdsde/article/25/3/334/5734969

Bae, S. (2023). A study on the difficulty of communication through sign language in non-English speaking countries. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(10), 594-506. https://www.scirp.org/pdf/jss_2023102610254052.pdf

Bidoli, C. (2016). Sign language and interpreting: A diachronic symbiosis. Interpreters’ Newsletter, 21, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.13137/1591-4127/13733

Chernov, G. V. (2004). Inference and anticipation in simultaneous interpreting: A probability-prediction model. John Benjamins.

Dusi, N. (2015). Intersemiotic Translation: Theories, Problems, Analysis. Semiotica, 206, 181-205. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem20150018/pdf

Gómez, M. J. L., Molina, T. B., Benítez, P. P., & de Torres, J. S. (2007). Predicting proficiency in signed language interpreting: A preliminary study. Interpreting, 9(1), 71-93.

Jakobson, R. (2021). On linguistic aspects of translation. In L. Venuti (Ed.), The translation studies reader (4th ed., pp. 156–161). Routledge.Jacobson

Jia, H. (2017). Roman Jakobson’s triadic division of translation revisited. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 13(1), 31-46. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/css-2017-0003/html?lang=en

Livingston, S., Singer, B., & Abramson, T. (1995). A study to determine the effectiveness of two kinds of interpreting. In Proceedings of the RID Convention (pp. 154–176).

Mandini, D.D.S. (2020). Pro dan kontra Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2016 tentang penyandang disabilitas. Jurnal Caraka Prabu 4(2),164-174. https://ejournal.fisip.unjani.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-caraka-prabu/article/download/284/154

Mujiyanto, Y. 2018. Multimodality in English-Indonesian intersemiotic translation. UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation Proceedings Vol.188. Universitas Negeri Semarang: 1-10.

Napier, J., & Barker, R. (2004). Sign language interpreting. Sign Language Studies, 4(4), 369–393.

Nababan, M.R., Nuraeni, A., Sumardiono. (2012). Pengembangan model kualitas terjemahan. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 24(1), 39-57. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/2220/4.%20MANGATUR%20NABABAN.pdf?sequence=1

Nugroho, F.A. dan Lintangsari, A.P. 2022. Deaf students’ challenges in learning English: A literature review. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies 9(2), 217-224. https://ijds.ub.ac.id/index.php/ijds/article/download/421/285

Rahmawati, K. (2023). Urgensi bahasa isyarat dalam program dakwah di TVRI Jawa Tengah. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo. Semarang. https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/20370/1/Skripsi_1701026102_Kiki_Rahmawati.pdf

Rahyono, R. dan Suwiryo, A.I. (2018). Pengembangan Fungsi Ragam Bahasa Isyarat Alamiah, Bisindo sebagai Sarana Kecerdasan Orang Tuli (Working Paper). Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa.

Semunyu, F.Y. dan Rashahu, B. (2023). Challenges and Coping Mechanisms in Sign Language Interpretation at the University of Dar es Salaam. Education and Development 41(1), 127-142. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ped/article/view/251544

Stone, C. (2007). Deaf Translators/Interpreters’ Renderings Processes - the Translation of Oral Languages. The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter 1(1), 53-72. http://hdl.handle.net/2436/625414

Trimble, E. M. (2014). The rural interpreter (Doctoral dissertation). Western Oregon University.

Yuliastuti, N. (2017). Bahasa Isyarat dalam Program Berita Televisi di TV One dan TVRI. Skripsi. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. Serang. https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/982/1/Nurkhikmah%20Yuliastuti%20Skripsi%20-%20Copy.pdf

Zulphica, E. (2017). Konflik kebijakan penggunaan sistem bahasa isyarat di Indonesia [Policy conflict over the use of sign language systems in Indonesia]. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 6(1), 100–109


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: ellic@unimus.ac.id