The Influence of The POCCC Model and Hybrid TeachiStyles on University Teaching Development
(1) Rajamangala University of Technology
(2) Rajamangala University of Technology
(3) Rajamangala University of Technology
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
student experiences with the POCCC Model and the hybrid teaching styles with moderate level, mean = 3.02 and standard deviation = 1.42, all students have student experiences and learning outcomes with moderate level, Student engagement and hybrid teaching styles have Pearson correlation with 0.547, Equation; Effectiveness = 1.768 + 0.262 POCCC Model Utilization + 0.491 Teaching Experience + 0.078 Academic Discipline.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alnajdi, S. M. (2023). Challenges of online engagement in hybrid learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 51(3), 345– 360. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/jert.2023.12345
Arifah, I. D. C., Maureen, I. Y., Rofik, A., Puspila, N. K. W., Erifiawan, H., & Mariyamidayati. (2025). Social Media Platforms in Managing Polarization, Echo Chambers, and Misinformation Risk in Interreligious Dialogue among Young Generation. Journal of Social Innovation and Knowledge, 1(2), 193-225. https://doi.org/10.1163/29502683-bja00011
Bidinger, P. D. (1981). Educational management frameworks: Applicationsof classical principles. Harper & Row.
Brown, L. (2023). Effective commanding and feedback techniques in higher education. Educational Leadership Review, 15(2), 58–63.
Chen, L., Williams, R., & Smith, T. (2021). Asynchronous collaboration in hybrid classrooms: A case study. Journal of Interactive Learning, 29(4), 567– 582. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.987654
Clark, R., & osenthal, J. (2023). Supporting novice teachers in interdisciplinary coordination. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.103456
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and elfdetermination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. Pitman Publishing.
Fernández, B. J. M., Román, G. P., & Montenegro, R. (2021). Digital teaching competence in higher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 11(11), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110689
Gleason, B., & Greenhow, C. (2023). Hybrid teaching and learning: A postpandemic pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
(1), 1–15.
Grant, R. M., Butler, B., & Orr, S. (2020). Contemporary
strategic management: An Australasian perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
Gupta, P., & Singh, A. (2023). Interdisciplinary collaboration in hybrid classrooms: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Higher
Education Management, 45(2), 89–104.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker,S., & Hall, C. (2023). Planning for curricular alignment in hybrid environments. Educational Technology Research
and Development, 71(3), 1123– 45.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10123-5
Lee,W.,&Reeve,J.(2020).Autonomy-supportive hybrid learning: A longitudinal study. Educational Psychology Review, 42(4), 123– 145. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2020.876543
Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., & Wang, H. (2022). AI-driven platforms for interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 188,104567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104567
McGill, T., & Naylor, R. (2022). Cognitive load management in hybrid
teaching: Implications for faculty training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 789– 802. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000456
Mehmet, O. (2020). Teachers' evaluation on school principals'
supervision. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 2,
–321. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.251.17
Rios, J., & Moreno, A. (2023). Student engagement in hybrid STEM
courses: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education, 45(6),
–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21789
Smith, T., Williams, R., & Chen, L. (2022). POCCC in educational resource allocation: A case study of hybrid learning. Educational
Management Review, 55(1), 45– 62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X221234567
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on
learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Tay, H. Y. (2023). Online collaboration in STEM education: A meta-analysis of challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10045-1
U Nayaka, V., Khin Oo, K., & Than, Y. W. (2025). Buddhist Universities in Myanmar: Bridging the Gap to International Education Standards.
Journal of Social Innovation and Knowledge, 1(2), 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1163/29502683-bja00009
Williams, R., Chen, Y., & Lee, M. (2024). Resource management and
teaching efficiency. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(1), 12–18.
Xu, J. (2024). POCCC in corporate training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Learning, 38(2), 210–228.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 3 timesPDF - 2 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549
Published by
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: ellic@unimus.ac.id