The Application of Strategic Competition in EFL Setting in Transactional and Interpersonal Conversation Class
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study attempts to describe the communication strategies (CS) utilized by English education students in the first semester at the University of Muhammadiyah Semarang. Data derived from the transcription of online conversation using virtual video conference occurred in the classroom. By evaluating their utterances and applying Celce Murcia (1995) typologies of communication strategies, this descriptive qualitative study was able to determine the frequency of communication methods utilized in the class of Transactional and Interpersonal Conversation. According to the findings, the frequency of communication strategies was Avoidance Strategies (15%), compensatory strategies (48%), Stalling or time gaining strategies including fillers, hesitations, and gambits (16%), and appeal for help (22%).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Artini, L. (1998). Is speaking easier than writing? exploring the complexity of spoken language. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5, 38-48
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z. Thurell S. (1995). A pedagogical frame work for communicative competence; A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Applied Linguistics 6 (2): 5-35.
Cenoz, Jasone. (1998). Pauses and communication strategies in second language speech, US Department of Education, University of the Basque country, Report-Research.
Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 55-85.
Fitriati, S. & Lisa, A. (2019). Discourse studies in english language education. Unnes Press
Heriansyah, H. (2012). Speaking problems faced by the english department students of syiah kuala university. Lingua Dikdatika, Desember 2012, 6 (1), p. 37-44
Nailufar, Y. (2018). Analysis of motivation to study english. English Education Journal
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication Strategies, Foreigner Talk and Repair in Inter language Learning.
Thanh, N.C. (2015). The differences between spoken and written grammar in english, in comparison with vietnamese. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 11, Juli-Desember 2015, 138-153
Ting, et.al. (2017). Communication strategy use and proficiency level of ESL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14 (1) 2017, 162-170.
Widyasmoro, C. (2019). Students’ difficulties in speaking english at the tenth grade of sekolah menengah kejuruan. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 3 (4) Desember 2019, 533 – 538.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 162 timesPDF - 31 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549
Published by
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: ellic@unimus.ac.id