Comparative Response to Printed and Digital Format Poetry: A Case Study of Ubaidil’s Poem Sarmin dan Kampung Masa Kecilnya

Tatang Iskarna(1*)


(1) Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study compares readers' responses to printed and digital poetry, focusing on video poetry Sarmin dan Kampung Masa Kecilnya written by Ade Ubaidil to understand how different presentation mediums impact engagement, interpretation, and emotional connection to poetry. With advancing technology challenging print media, questions arise about how format influences literary works, particularly poetry. Authors, publishers, and educators must adapt to changing reading habits and preferences by understanding reader responses to printed and digital media. Employing qualitative methods, the study conducts a survey, focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews to explore participants' experiences, preferences, and perspectives. The survey measures emotional involvement; explores mood, atmosphere, message understanding, and multimedia influence; and examines the preferences concerning memory recall and authorship authenticity perceptions. Of the 65 students surveyed, preferences differed when asked directly about reading the poem Sarmin dan Kampung Masa Kecilnya, with 40 preferring digital, 23 printed, and 2 both. Digital formats showed mixed effects on reader engagement, emotional response, and comprehension. While digital readers demonstrated higher interest, emotional response, and mood understanding, they showed less understanding of tone and storyline compared to print readers. Multimedia was largely viewed as beneficial. Digital formats exhibited better memory recall but raised more concerns about authenticity, with more students trusting printed materials. Recommendations varied, with 30 students preferring digital, 22 printed, 6 both, and 7 suggesting format depending on the reader and text. These findings underscore the complex relationship between format choices, reader engagement, and perceptions of authenticity in contemporary literature consumption. Flexibility and consideration of individual tastes and literary content are emphasized for adapting to evolving preferences 

Keywords


Digital format, printed format, digital poetry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cuiñas, A. A. F., & Augusto, V. P. (2022). The Smell of Printed Books: A Qualitative Comparison between Printed and Digital Formats. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 214–255. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12053

Haddock, G., Foad, C., Saul, V., Brown, W., & Thompson, R. (2020). The medium can influence the message: Print‐based versus digital reading influences how people process different types of written information. British Journal of Psychology, 111(3), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12415

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame.

Iskarna, T. (2023). Alternative Models of Electronic Literary Criticism: Intermedial and Ergodic. Journal of Language and Literature, 23(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v23i1.5946

Manugeren, M. (2019). Literature in the Principal of Industrial Revolution 4.0. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i19.4828

Nur Asima Sidabutar, M., Theruvil Sayed, B., Ismail, S. M., Teves Quispe, J., Yangali Vicente, J. S., Suardi Wekke, I., Jassaim Shanan, A., & Nourabadi, S. (2022). Reading Digital Texts vs. Reading Printed Texts: Which One Is More Effective in Iranian EFL Context? Education Research International, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7188266

Rettberg, S. (2019). Electronic Literature. Polity Press.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economy Forum.

Ubaidil, A. (2020). Sarmin dan Kampung Masa Kecilnya. Quadraterz. https://www.quadraterz.com/2020/06/puisi-sarmin-dan-kampung-masa-kecilnya.html


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 87 times
PDF - 12 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: ellic@unimus.ac.id